成人**美色阁,欧美一级专区免费大片,久久这里只有精品18,国产日产欧产美韩系列app,久久亚洲电影www电影网,王多鱼打扑克视频下载软件

 
+更多
專家名錄
唐朱昌
唐朱昌
教授,博士生導師。復旦大學中國反洗錢研究中心首任主任,復旦大學俄...
嚴立新
嚴立新
復旦大學國際金融學院教授,中國反洗錢研究中心執行主任,陸家嘴金...
陳浩然
陳浩然
復旦大學法學院教授、博士生導師;復旦大學國際刑法研究中心主任。...
何 萍
何 萍
華東政法大學刑法學教授,復旦大學中國反洗錢研究中心特聘研究員,荷...
李小杰
李小杰
安永金融服務風險管理、咨詢總監,曾任螞蟻金服反洗錢總監,復旦大學...
周錦賢
周錦賢
周錦賢先生,香港人,廣州暨南大學法律學士,復旦大學中國反洗錢研究中...
童文俊
童文俊
高級經濟師,復旦大學金融學博士,復旦大學經濟學博士后。現供職于中...
湯 俊
湯 俊
武漢中南財經政法大學信息安全學院教授。長期專注于反洗錢/反恐...
李 剛
李 剛
生辰:1977.7.26 籍貫:遼寧撫順 民族:漢 黨派:九三學社 職稱:教授 研究...
祝亞雄
祝亞雄
祝亞雄,1974年生,浙江衢州人。浙江師范大學經濟與管理學院副教授,博...
顧卿華
顧卿華
復旦大學中國反洗錢研究中心特聘研究員;現任安永管理咨詢服務合伙...
張平
張平
工作履歷:曾在國家審計署從事審計工作,是國家第一批政府審計師;曾在...
轉發
上傳時間: 2010-06-08      瀏覽次數:2073次
Developed Nations Accused Of Laundering $30b Climate Fund

Jun.07, 2010

 

Developed countries have been accused of not being sincere with their climate funding commitments.

 

A non-governmental organisation (NGO), Friends of the Earth International (FoI), has alleged at the ongoing United Nations Climate Talks in Bonn that much of the $30 billion fast-start fund promised is recycled aid money already committed for essential programmes in the developing world.

 

Describing the money as ‘grossly inadequate,’ the group urged the countries to alter their plans over climate funding to prevent a repeat of the fallout from Copenhagen. FoI chair, Nnimmo Bassey, said, “It seems developed countries are finally taking recycling seriously; they are recycling aid money and calling it ‘fresh’ money. But the world will not be fooled. Laundering aid money for climate change does not show leadership, it shows contempt.

 

“Having done the most to cause climate change, developed nations are morally and legally obliged to support the additional cost in developing countries for adaptation measures and for clean renewable technology.”

 

Officials of Tuvalu, a small island nation severely threatened by climate change, submitted that the Copenhagen Accord’s Green Fund was being used for coercive political purpose to get support for the weak provisions of the Accord. Along with some other developing countries, they expressed outrage over rich countries’ attempts to count existing commitments as new climate money, in contravention of agreed criterion of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).

 

Alleging that rich nations were attempting to place control of climate funds with the World Bank, the FoI called for the establishment of a new global climate fund under the full authority of the UNFCCC, based on principles of equity and environmental integrity to support the aims of communities around the world.

 

Asad Rehman of the FoI in the United Kingdom stated, “The motivation of the United States and other developed countries is clear - they want the World Bank to call the shots. This is unacceptable. The World Bank is an undemocratic discredited institution that is far adept at causing climate change than preventing it.

 

The World Bank is the number one lender to environmentally and socially destructive projects around the globe, ranging from fossil fuel lending to subsiding deforestation.

 

 Most recently, it approved a new loan for South Africa to build the world’s 4th largest coal plant, described by South African civil society as an environmental and social disaster.”

 

Karen Orenstein of the FoI in the US noted, “People in developing countries are already being forced to cope with the impacts of climate population that the World Bank is causing, while efforts to reduce poverty - which the Bank purports to support - are undercut by the climate crisis. The best thing the World Bank can do is no harm in the first place. It must get out of the business of climate pollution.”

 

In a related development, the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) has urged delegates to the ongoing climate talks to establish a post-2012 global climate change regime. The organisation wants parties to strive to agree on the building blocks for a deal at the next UNFCCC Summit in Cancun in Mexico , this year.