教授，博士生導師。復旦大學中國反洗錢研究中心首任主任，復旦大學俄...
復旦大學國際金融學院教授，中國反洗錢研究中心執行主任，陸家嘴金...
復旦大學法學院教授、博士生導師；復旦大學國際刑法研究中心主任。...
華東政法大學刑法學教授，復旦大學中國反洗錢研究中心特聘研究員，荷...
安永金融服務風險管理、咨詢總監，曾任螞蟻金服反洗錢總監，復旦大學...
周錦賢先生，香港人，廣州暨南大學法律學士，復旦大學中國反洗錢研究中...
高級經濟師，復旦大學金融學博士，復旦大學經濟學博士后。現供職于中...
武漢中南財經政法大學信息安全學院教授。長期專注于反洗錢/反恐...
生辰：1977.7.26 籍貫：遼寧撫順 民族：漢 黨派：九三學社 職稱：教授 研究...
祝亞雄，1974年生，浙江衢州人。浙江師范大學經濟與管理學院副教授，博...
復旦大學中國反洗錢研究中心特聘研究員；現任安永管理咨詢服務合伙...
工作履歷：曾在國家審計署從事審計工作，是國家第一批政府審計師；曾在...
Jun.22, 2010, 22:26 PM
KUALA LUMPUR, June 22 (Bernama) -- A businessman was found guilty by the Sessions Court here Tuesday of being an illegal fund manager for investments worth RM65 million through the Internet.
Judge S.M. Komathy Suppiah made the ruling against Phazaluddin Abu, 49, after finding that defence counsel J. Chandra had failed to raise reasonable doubts in the case.
However, she set July 7 for mitigation and sentencing.
Phazaluddin Abu, 49, from Johor, was said to have held himself out as a fund manager, through the Internet website www.danafutures.com, without holding a fund manager's licence.
He was charged with committing the offence at Affiliate Shoppers Network, No. 14, First Floor, Jalan Opera C, U2/C, TTDI Jaya, Shah Alam between January and March 2007.
The offence, under Section 15A (1) of the Securities Industry Act 1983, carries a fine of up to RM1 million or 10 years' jail or both upon conviction.
Phazaluddin was also convicted of three counts of taking part in money laundering involving RM1,339,324 million.
He was alleged to have accepted proceeds from illegal activities ranging between RM109,724 and RM860,000 through the Affiliate Shoppers Network's bank account, his bank account and a bank account of one B. Rathimalar, between Jan 8, 2007 and March 7, 2007.
In her judgment, Komathy said the evidence by the defence was a complete fabrication and contrary to the facts in the case.
She said the defence also failed to raise reasonable doubts against the prosecution's case in denying that Danafutures Website was owned, controlled and managed by the accused.
She said Phazaluddin, in his defence, claimed that the website was owned and controlled by an individual known as Maidin and denied the money in his bank account was obtained from money laundering on investments in the scheme.
"If Maidin is not fictitious, it is weird because the accused did not know his full name and has no office documents to show that Maidin is his client, and none of the prosecution witnesses knew him.
"The inconsistencies in the evidence by the accused had also weakened his case," he added.