教授，博士生導師。復旦大學中國反洗錢研究中心首任主任，復旦大學俄...
復旦大學國際金融學院教授，中國反洗錢研究中心執行主任，陸家嘴金...
復旦大學法學院教授、博士生導師；復旦大學國際刑法研究中心主任。...
華東政法大學刑法學教授，復旦大學中國反洗錢研究中心特聘研究員，荷...
安永金融服務風險管理、咨詢總監，曾任螞蟻金服反洗錢總監，復旦大學...
周錦賢先生，香港人，廣州暨南大學法律學士，復旦大學中國反洗錢研究中...
高級經濟師，復旦大學金融學博士，復旦大學經濟學博士后。現供職于中...
武漢中南財經政法大學信息安全學院教授。長期專注于反洗錢/反恐...
生辰：1977.7.26 籍貫：遼寧撫順 民族：漢 黨派：九三學社 職稱：教授 研究...
祝亞雄，1974年生，浙江衢州人。浙江師范大學經濟與管理學院副教授，博...
復旦大學中國反洗錢研究中心特聘研究員；現任安永管理咨詢服務合伙...
工作履歷：曾在國家審計署從事審計工作，是國家第一批政府審計師；曾在...
https://bankingjournal.aba.com/2024/10/54276/
An interagency proposal to require financial institutions to establish and maintain risk-based anti-money laundering programs is flawed in that it would formalize a nearly universal recordkeeping practice and elevate it to become the foundation of all Bank Secrecy Act compliance, the American Bankers Association said in a letter to banking agencies.
The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network in June proposed banks add requirements, including elevating a new mandatory written risk assessment process, as the foundation of an “effective, risk-based and reasonably designed” AML/CFT program. The changes are meant to implement the AML Act, passed by Congress in 2021. The Federal Reserve, FDIC and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency have proposed aligning each agency’s BSA compliance program requirements with FinCEN’s proposal.
In its letter, ABA reiterated concerns with a proposed requirement to have banks produce and periodically update a single written risk assessment, based on a formal risk assessment process. ABA pointed to its Sept. 3 letter to FinCEN in which the association provided several recommendations to improve the proposal. Among the suggestions was for agencies to adopt the language of the AML Act and require that a reasonably designed AML/CFT program focuses attention and resources in a manner consistent with the bank’s risk profile. Such a program would take into account higher-risk and lower-risk customers and activities.
ABA also made three additional requests. First, all BSA program rule requirements and supervisory expectations for banks should not just be consistent, but identical. Second, the agencies should unequivocally release banks from any requirement or supervisory expectation to establish a single written risk assessment document solely to comply with FinCEN’s revised rule. Third, the agencies provide additional specific and clear indications of ways a bank can reasonably meet the new program rule requirements.