教授，博士生導師。復旦大學中國反洗錢研究中心首任主任，復旦大學俄...
復旦大學國際金融學院教授，中國反洗錢研究中心執行主任，陸家嘴金...
復旦大學法學院教授、博士生導師；復旦大學國際刑法研究中心主任。...
華東政法大學刑法學教授，復旦大學中國反洗錢研究中心特聘研究員，荷...
安永金融服務風險管理、咨詢總監，曾任螞蟻金服反洗錢總監，復旦大學...
周錦賢先生，香港人，廣州暨南大學法律學士，復旦大學中國反洗錢研究中...
高級經濟師，復旦大學金融學博士，復旦大學經濟學博士后。現供職于中...
武漢中南財經政法大學信息安全學院教授。長期專注于反洗錢/反恐...
生辰：1977.7.26 籍貫：遼寧撫順 民族：漢 黨派：九三學社 職稱：教授 研究...
祝亞雄，1974年生，浙江衢州人。浙江師范大學經濟與管理學院副教授，博...
復旦大學中國反洗錢研究中心特聘研究員；現任安永管理咨詢服務合伙...
工作履歷：曾在國家審計署從事審計工作，是國家第一批政府審計師；曾在...
The Supreme Court today stayed the trial proceedings in a money laundering case filed against lottery tycoon Santiago Martin under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) before a special court at Ernakulam, Kerala. Martin is recently in the news for being the largest purchaser of electoral bonds through his entity Future Gaming donating primarily to West Bengal ruling TMC and Tamil Nadu ruling DMK
A bench of Justices AS Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan today asked the Enforcement Directorate (ED) to respond to the plea filed by Martin seeking stay on the PMLA case until trial proceedings in another CBI case registered against him is complete as per a report by Bar & Bench.
Senior Advocate Aditya Sondhi along with Advocate Rohini Musa represented Martin. Popularly known as Lottery King, he has been accused of being involved in a lottery scam, which is reportedly linked to distribution of lottery tickets of the Sikkim government in Kerala.
The ED had booked him in a money laundering case based on a chargesheet filed by the Kochi office of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), in which he was charged with certain provisions of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) as well as the Lotteries (Regulation) Act of 1998.
He was accused of causing an approximate loss of over INR 900 crores to the Sikkim government as per a report by ThePrint.
This present application was later transferred to Special Court, Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ernakulam.
Martin’s plea to halt the PMLA trial against him was dismissed last month by a Special PMLA Court at Ernakulam.
The trial court had opined that the CBI and ED cases were separate and that the trial court did not have the power to stay the trial as sought for by Martin.Therefore, Martin approached the apex court with the current plea for relief.