教授，博士生導師。復旦大學中國反洗錢研究中心首任主任，復旦大學俄...
復旦大學國際金融學院教授，中國反洗錢研究中心執行主任，陸家嘴金...
復旦大學法學院教授、博士生導師；復旦大學國際刑法研究中心主任。...
華東政法大學刑法學教授，復旦大學中國反洗錢研究中心特聘研究員，荷...
安永金融服務風險管理、咨詢總監，曾任螞蟻金服反洗錢總監，復旦大學...
周錦賢先生，香港人，廣州暨南大學法律學士，復旦大學中國反洗錢研究中...
高級經濟師，復旦大學金融學博士，復旦大學經濟學博士后。現供職于中...
武漢中南財經政法大學信息安全學院教授。長期專注于反洗錢/反恐...
生辰：1977.7.26 籍貫：遼寧撫順 民族：漢 黨派：九三學社 職稱：教授 研究...
祝亞雄，1974年生，浙江衢州人。浙江師范大學經濟與管理學院副教授，博...
復旦大學中國反洗錢研究中心特聘研究員；現任安永管理咨詢服務合伙...
工作履歷：曾在國家審計署從事審計工作，是國家第一批政府審計師；曾在...
https://blockchain.news/news/french-hill-challenges-warrens-anti-money-laundering-act
U.S. Representative French Hill questions the efficacy of Senator Elizabeth Warren's Digital Asset Anti-Money Laundering Act, arguing it won't deter terrorist organizations from using cryptocurrencies. The act's broad regulatory scope, including miners and validators, sparks controversy.
The Digital Asset Anti-Money Laundering Act, French Hill, Elizabeth Warren, cryptocurrency regulation, blockchain technology, bitcoin miners, validators, and anti-money laundering are all terms that you should be familiar with.
The goal of the Digital Asset Anti-Money Laundering Act, which is being led by Senator Elizabeth Warren and Senator Roger Marshall, is to fix gaps that might potentially enable criminals to launder money via the use of cryptocurrencies. Critics, on the other hand, claim that the proposed law might amount to an excessive amount of authority since it would treat software developers and transaction validators as if they were financial institutions. This could possibly stifle innovation and the usage of cryptocurrencies. There are fears that such restrictions would not be able to effectively prohibit terrorist groups from utilizing digital assets for the purpose of illegal fundraising, and these issues are brought up by critics, like Representative French Hill.
On Capitol Hill, this piece of legislation has ignited a heated discussion, with proponents advocating for tougher monitoring to stop money laundering operations related with crypto assets. They also emphasize the need for updated regulations to address this contemporary problem. Opponents, on the other hand, are concerned that the widespread implementation of these rules might effectively outlaw cryptocurrency by placing unachievable criteria on individuals within the blockchain ecosystem, such as miners and validators. The existence of these issues highlights the persistent contradiction that exists between the necessity for regulatory frameworks that safeguard against financial crimes and the need to support technical innovation and financial privacy within the fast growing realm of digital assets.
This discussion is a subset of a wider discussion that is taking on regarding the function of digital assets within the framework of the global financial system and the equilibrium that exists between innovation and regulation. The consequences of such legislative measures will have a substantial influence on the future of cryptocurrency operations and their incorporation into mainstream finance. This is because digital currencies are continuing to acquire importance.