成人**美色阁,欧美一级专区免费大片,久久这里只有精品18,国产日产欧产美韩系列app,久久亚洲电影www电影网,王多鱼打扑克视频下载软件

 
+更多
專家名錄
唐朱昌
唐朱昌
教授,博士生導(dǎo)師。復(fù)旦大學(xué)中國反洗錢研究中心首任主任,復(fù)旦大學(xué)俄...
嚴立新
嚴立新
復(fù)旦大學(xué)國際金融學(xué)院教授,中國反洗錢研究中心執(zhí)行主任,陸家嘴金...
陳浩然
陳浩然
復(fù)旦大學(xué)法學(xué)院教授、博士生導(dǎo)師;復(fù)旦大學(xué)國際刑法研究中心主任。...
何 萍
何 萍
華東政法大學(xué)刑法學(xué)教授,復(fù)旦大學(xué)中國反洗錢研究中心特聘研究員,荷...
李小杰
李小杰
安永金融服務(wù)風(fēng)險管理、咨詢總監(jiān),曾任螞蟻金服反洗錢總監(jiān),復(fù)旦大學(xué)...
周錦賢
周錦賢
周錦賢先生,香港人,廣州暨南大學(xué)法律學(xué)士,復(fù)旦大學(xué)中國反洗錢研究中...
童文俊
童文俊
高級經(jīng)濟師,復(fù)旦大學(xué)金融學(xué)博士,復(fù)旦大學(xué)經(jīng)濟學(xué)博士后。現(xiàn)供職于中...
湯 俊
湯 俊
武漢中南財經(jīng)政法大學(xué)信息安全學(xué)院教授。長期專注于反洗錢/反恐...
李 剛
李 剛
生辰:1977.7.26 籍貫:遼寧撫順 民族:漢 黨派:九三學(xué)社 職稱:教授 研究...
祝亞雄
祝亞雄
祝亞雄,1974年生,浙江衢州人。浙江師范大學(xué)經(jīng)濟與管理學(xué)院副教授,博...
顧卿華
顧卿華
復(fù)旦大學(xué)中國反洗錢研究中心特聘研究員;現(xiàn)任安永管理咨詢服務(wù)合伙...
張平
張平
工作履歷:曾在國家審計署從事審計工作,是國家第一批政府審計師;曾在...
轉(zhuǎn)發(fā)
上傳時間: 2023-12-18      瀏覽次數(shù):819次
Prosecution considering more charges against money laundering accused Su Baolin; defence restates cancer risk

 

https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/companies-markets/banking-finance/prosecution-considering-more-charges-against-money-laundering

 

POLICE have uncovered more potential forged documents submitted by Su Baolin to financial institutions, which may lead to further charges against him, prosecutors said in court on Friday (Dec 15).

 

In particular, the Cambodian passport holder may have submitted falsified financial statements and income tax returns related to his company Xinbao Investment Holdings, artificially inflating its revenue and trade receivables to give the impression that it is profitable.

 

The police is considering additional charges for forgery, fraud, cheating or other money laundering-related offences against Su, indicating a “l(fā)ikely prospect of increased jail time” if found guilty, said Deputy Public Prosecutor (DPP) Ng Jean Ting.

 

Su is also alleged to have derived S$5 million to S$6 million in the cryptocurrency Tether from illegal activities in Myanmar between 2020 and 2022. This is being stored in “digital wallets of other individuals”, the affidavit filed by the investigating officer indicated.

 

Su therefore holds significant assets overseas through foreigners, and the full extent of his overseas assets may not be known, contributing to his real flight risk, said DPP Ng.

 

These were factors raised by the prosecution in arguing against bail for Su, who currently faces two forgery charges.

 

District Judge Brenda Tan on Friday denied Su bail, saying that she agreed with the prosecution that Su remained a flight risk, as he had substantial assets overseas and the means to abscond.

 

She highlighted the investigating officer’s affidavit, which indicated that Su directed a third party to convert Tether worth S$4.7 million – part of his alleged earnings from illegal activities – into physical fiat, a government-issued currency, or to make payments on his behalf in Singapore.

 

The amount, which was significant in the judge’s view, is in addition to the more than S$90 million in assets under his and his wife’s name that was seized by the police.

 

His medical condition, which his defence counsel relied on heavily as grounds for granting bail, is also not sufficiently exceptional, she said, adding that the Singapore Prison Service had adequate facilities to care for him.

 

Su is one of the 10 foreign nationals arrested on Aug 15 this year who are embroiled in the S$2.8 billion money laundering case.

 

In court for Su’s second bail review, defence counsel Sunil Sudheesan said that his client believes his statements about his cryptocurrency and overseas assets were misinterpreted by the investigating officer. This was despite a certified Mandarin interpreter being present during Su’s questioning.

 

Sudheesan said that, should Su be let out on bail, the defence could either bring in their own interpreter or be present during the investigating officer’s interviews with the accused, which would remove any possibility of misinterpretation.

 

Su’s health condition

 

The lawyer also took issue with the alleged inadequate care given to his client at Changi Prison, where he has been remanded.

 

Su, who has a congenital heart condition, was in July assessed by a doctor to be at high risk of gastric cancer, and was recommended for a gastroscopy. However, Sudheesan said that his client has not undergone this procedure, and was assessed by a gastroenterologist only once, for five minutes.

 

This is inadequate care. If it was any one of our relatives, we would have been insistent on an early gastroscopy,” noted Sudheesan.

 

He added that Su had said he was not given adequate oxygen once while in remand, which could have been particularly detrimental to him given his heart condition. “I’m not mincing my words when I say prison is gambling with the accused’s life,” said the lawyer.

 

In response, DPP Ng said that the accused’s medical condition is “not exceptional”, and adequate care has been given to him.

 

An affidavit from a doctor from the prison said that it is aware of Su’s gastric cancer risk and had allowed a gastroenterologist from Changi General Hospital to assess him.

 

As he was transported to the hospital for his checkup, he was attended to by medical professionals.

 

DPP Ng added that although the gastroenterologist met with Su for just five minutes, there is no reason to say the specialist doctor was negligent or flippant in his review of Su.

 

While in remand, Su is being housed in a medical centre, and has access to various medical facilities, the affidavit noted. He also has his vitals monitored, and has a bedside call bell.

 

Replying to Su’s allegation that doctors had on one occasion failed to give him adequate oxygen, DPP Ng said that doctors had then assessed that “the need for oxygen therapy had not yet arisen”.

 

She concluded that the shortcomings in care alleged by the accused are unfounded and do not constitute a material change in circumstances, which is required for bail to be granted in a subsequent bail review.

 

Su will return to court on Jan 24 for a pre-trial conference.

 

He is also involved in a separate High Court case involving his mortgaged 69 Ocean Drive home in Sentosa Cove. OCBC is seeking at least S$19.7 million from him, as well as repossession of the property.