教授，博士生導師。復旦大學中國反洗錢研究中心首任主任，復旦大學俄...
復旦大學國際金融學院教授，中國反洗錢研究中心執行主任，陸家嘴金...
復旦大學法學院教授、博士生導師；復旦大學國際刑法研究中心主任。...
華東政法大學刑法學教授，復旦大學中國反洗錢研究中心特聘研究員，荷...
安永金融服務風險管理、咨詢總監，曾任螞蟻金服反洗錢總監，復旦大學...
周錦賢先生，香港人，廣州暨南大學法律學士，復旦大學中國反洗錢研究中...
高級經濟師，復旦大學金融學博士，復旦大學經濟學博士后。現供職于中...
武漢中南財經政法大學信息安全學院教授。長期專注于反洗錢/反恐...
生辰：1977.7.26 籍貫：遼寧撫順 民族：漢 黨派：九三學社 職稱：教授 研究...
祝亞雄，1974年生，浙江衢州人。浙江師范大學經濟與管理學院副教授，博...
復旦大學中國反洗錢研究中心特聘研究員；現任安永管理咨詢服務合伙...
工作履歷：曾在國家審計署從事審計工作，是國家第一批政府審計師；曾在...
https://www.clydeco.com/en/insights/2023/12/first-solicitor-conviction-for-tipping-off-client
A solicitor has been handed a nine-month suspended prison sentence following his conviction for “tipping off” a client about a money laundering investigation by the Serious Fraud Office (SFO). The SFO has said that William Osmond, co-founder of Osmond & Osmond Solicitors Ltd, is the first ever solicitor to be prosecuted on this basis.
The SFO was investigating the funding of the purchase of a ￡4m property in Mayfair in 2013 by a company based in the British Virgin Islands, owned by James Redding Ramsay. In 2018, SFO investigators made covert enquiries of Mr. Ramsay’s solicitor, Mr. Osmond, who immediately contacted his client to inform him of the investigation. Over the next five months, Mr. Osmond met with Mr. Ramsay to discuss the matter, including by flying out to Mr. Ramsay’s home in Malta. Mr. Osmond also prepared a fake letter of engagement that set out his role as solicitor for the British Virgin Islands company in 2013.
The SFO searched Mr. Osmond’s office in 2019 and found handwritten notes of his discussions with Mr. Ramsay regarding the investigation and records of his forgery of the engagement letter. Mr. Osmond was the Money Laundering Reporting Officer (MLRO) for his firm at the time.
Following a five day trial at the Old Bailey, Mr. Osmond was convicted of tipping off under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (“POCA”), and also on one charge of forgery. The maximum sentence following conviction in the Crown Court for a tipping off offence can be up to five years' imprisonment.
It seems likely that the SFO’s decision to prosecute this case was motivated by the deliberate and repeated steps taken by Mr Osmond to inform his client about the SFO investigation, despite having been explicitly warned not to by the SFO. His role as MLRO for his firm was noted by the judge as a factor in his sentencing, and she rejected the suggestion that the offence was committed out of naivety. Mr. Osmond has also been ordered to carry out 100 hours of unpaid work and to pay ￡5,000 towards the SFO’s costs (they had originally sought ￡300,000 in costs).
The Solicitors’ Regulation Authority confirmed that they had been awaiting the outcome of the SFO’s prosecution before taking any steps in relation to Mr Osmond, and will now “collect all relevant information before deciding on next steps”. This comes as the new Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 received royal assent and became law on 26 October 2023. The new Act permits the SRA to impose unlimited fines on traditional law firms, solicitors or employees in cases related to economic crime (the SRA’s fining powers for such firms/individuals are otherwise limited to ￡25,000). This provision extends to any breach of a regulatory obligation or professional misconduct which has the effect of inhibiting the prevention or detection of economic crime.
While the focus of firms and the guidance produced by the regulators is often on compliance with the Money Laundering Regulations 2017, this case is a salient reminder that firms and their lawyers must also be familiar with the underlying money laundering offences under POCA. Solicitors should keep at the front of their minds that they can not only be struck off but also imprisoned if they do not abide by the legislation.