教授，博士生導師。復旦大學中國反洗錢研究中心首任主任，復旦大學俄...
復旦大學國際金融學院教授，中國反洗錢研究中心執行主任，陸家嘴金...
復旦大學法學院教授、博士生導師；復旦大學國際刑法研究中心主任。...
華東政法大學刑法學教授，復旦大學中國反洗錢研究中心特聘研究員，荷...
安永金融服務風險管理、咨詢總監，曾任螞蟻金服反洗錢總監，復旦大學...
周錦賢先生，香港人，廣州暨南大學法律學士，復旦大學中國反洗錢研究中...
高級經濟師，復旦大學金融學博士，復旦大學經濟學博士后。現供職于中...
武漢中南財經政法大學信息安全學院教授。長期專注于反洗錢/反恐...
生辰：1977.7.26 籍貫：遼寧撫順 民族：漢 黨派：九三學社 職稱：教授 研究...
祝亞雄，1974年生，浙江衢州人。浙江師范大學經濟與管理學院副教授，博...
復旦大學中國反洗錢研究中心特聘研究員；現任安永管理咨詢服務合伙...
工作履歷：曾在國家審計署從事審計工作，是國家第一批政府審計師；曾在...
The Delhi High Court (HC) has dismissed a petition filed by smartphone manufacturer Vivo, which challenged the order that sent its Chinese employee to the Enforcement Directorate (ED) custody.
A trial court had earlier ordered to send a Chinese national, Guangwen alias Andrew Kuang, to a three-day ED remand in connection with a money laundering case involving the smartphone maker.
As per news agency PTI, Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma quashed the plea while noting that the Chinese national was involved in incorporating companies for acquiring and syphoning off funds.
“This court does not find any infirmity in the order of remand dated 10.10.2023 challenged before this Court… the present petition stands dismissed along with (the) pending application,” said the court in its order dated October 13.
The HC also noted that the grounds of arrest point to the Chinese national as the prime conspirator of the money laundering operation, which involved establishing companies that were used to acquire proceeds of the crime.
Arguing before the HC, the Chinese national’s counsel contended that his arrest was carried out in a ‘malafide manner’ and against the provisions of the PMLA.
However, the HC rejected the contention saying that the remand application specifically mentioned that the Vivo employee was ‘guilty’ of laundering money based on the probe so far and material collected.
This comes a week after ED conducted raids at several locations linked to Vivo and several of its associate companies. The agency arrested four executives of the Chinese smartphone maker, including the Chinese national, for flouting money laundering norms.
At the heart of the matter is a two-year long investigation into Vivo India which probed the allegations that the smartphone maker was escaping its tax liability by making remittances to foreign entities.
ED claims that the Chinese company allegedly transferred proceeds to the tune of INR 62,476 Cr out of India to avoid tax payments in the country. In the ensuing tussle, the directorate froze the company’s bank account as the company approached courts to seek some respite.
This comes at a time when a slew of Chinese companies, especially smartphone makers OPPO and Xiaomi, are under the radar of authorities for allegations that span tax evasion and money laundering.