教授，博士生導師。復旦大學中國反洗錢研究中心首任主任，復旦大學俄...
復旦大學國際金融學院教授，中國反洗錢研究中心執行主任，陸家嘴金...
復旦大學法學院教授、博士生導師；復旦大學國際刑法研究中心主任。...
華東政法大學刑法學教授，復旦大學中國反洗錢研究中心特聘研究員，荷...
安永金融服務風險管理、咨詢總監，曾任螞蟻金服反洗錢總監，復旦大學...
周錦賢先生，香港人，廣州暨南大學法律學士，復旦大學中國反洗錢研究中...
高級經濟師，復旦大學金融學博士，復旦大學經濟學博士后。現供職于中...
武漢中南財經政法大學信息安全學院教授。長期專注于反洗錢/反恐...
生辰：1977.7.26 籍貫：遼寧撫順 民族：漢 黨派：九三學社 職稱：教授 研究...
祝亞雄，1974年生，浙江衢州人。浙江師范大學經濟與管理學院副教授，博...
復旦大學中國反洗錢研究中心特聘研究員；現任安永管理咨詢服務合伙...
工作履歷：曾在國家審計署從事審計工作，是國家第一批政府審計師；曾在...
LAHORE: Taxpayers involved in money laundering prefer to challenge the jurisdiction of the income tax department instead of proving their innocence, said sources.
According to the sources, the taxpayers take the plea that the accounts of the company are being regularly audited and the company and the directors are being assessed as a taxpayer since last many years with no complaint of any concealment of income. Therefore, the proceedings initiated against them under the Anti Money Laundering Act (AMLA) are illegal and without jurisdiction.
They said the taxpayers also argue that since no penal consequence of criminal nature has been provided in the Income Tax Ordinance in case of any money laundering or tax evasion of Rs10 million and above, therefore, the tax department has no jurisdiction to lodge a complaint of money laundering against them, as it is only the jurisdiction of AMLA.
Those involved in money laundering also take the plea that the department has initiated anti money laundering proceedings against them when no complaint of incorrect or inaccurate submission of the statutory requirements against the company or its directors is under consideration of the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan (SECP).
According to the sources, the ultra rich taxpayers spend hefty pints to approach the highest appellate forums without realizing that criminal matters couldn’t be taken up in writ petitions since the same require detailed deliberation, lengthy arguments, recording of evidence and examination of witnesses etc.
They pointed out that the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 clearly reveals that in respect of matters which concerns evasion of taxes over Rs10 million or above, the same is referable to be dealt with under special law of AMLA, therefore, the plea that the department has no jurisdiction is always out of place and incorrect. They added that it is the directorate general office, which has been given jurisdiction to evaluate such type of matters.