成人**美色阁,欧美一级专区免费大片,久久这里只有精品18,国产日产欧产美韩系列app,久久亚洲电影www电影网,王多鱼打扑克视频下载软件

 
+更多
專家名錄
唐朱昌
唐朱昌
教授,博士生導(dǎo)師。復(fù)旦大學(xué)中國反洗錢研究中心首任主任,復(fù)旦大學(xué)俄...
嚴(yán)立新
嚴(yán)立新
復(fù)旦大學(xué)國際金融學(xué)院教授,中國反洗錢研究中心執(zhí)行主任,陸家嘴金...
陳浩然
陳浩然
復(fù)旦大學(xué)法學(xué)院教授、博士生導(dǎo)師;復(fù)旦大學(xué)國際刑法研究中心主任。...
何 萍
何 萍
華東政法大學(xué)刑法學(xué)教授,復(fù)旦大學(xué)中國反洗錢研究中心特聘研究員,荷...
李小杰
李小杰
安永金融服務(wù)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理、咨詢總監(jiān),曾任螞蟻金服反洗錢總監(jiān),復(fù)旦大學(xué)...
周錦賢
周錦賢
周錦賢先生,香港人,廣州暨南大學(xué)法律學(xué)士,復(fù)旦大學(xué)中國反洗錢研究中...
童文俊
童文俊
高級經(jīng)濟(jì)師,復(fù)旦大學(xué)金融學(xué)博士,復(fù)旦大學(xué)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)博士后。現(xiàn)供職于中...
湯 俊
湯 俊
武漢中南財(cái)經(jīng)政法大學(xué)信息安全學(xué)院教授。長期專注于反洗錢/反恐...
李 剛
李 剛
生辰:1977.7.26 籍貫:遼寧撫順 民族:漢 黨派:九三學(xué)社 職稱:教授 研究...
祝亞雄
祝亞雄
祝亞雄,1974年生,浙江衢州人。浙江師范大學(xué)經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理學(xué)院副教授,博...
顧卿華
顧卿華
復(fù)旦大學(xué)中國反洗錢研究中心特聘研究員;現(xiàn)任安永管理咨詢服務(wù)合伙...
張平
張平
工作履歷:曾在國家審計(jì)署從事審計(jì)工作,是國家第一批政府審計(jì)師;曾在...
轉(zhuǎn)發(fā)
上傳時(shí)間: 2023-09-18      瀏覽次數(shù):749次
Research Reveals Vulnerability Of Higher Education Institutions To Money Laundering

 

https://indiaeducationdiary.in/research-reveals-vulnerability-of-higher-education-institutions-to-money-laundering/

 

A “significant minority” of higher education institutions are failing to provide staff and students with guidance on money laundering risks, research from Cardiff University and the University of the West of England (UWE) has found.

 

The study, published in the journal the Criminal Law Review, says higher education institutions are not explicitly incorporated within the scope of UK anti-money laundering regulations, leaving a “significant gap” in how the law is being implemented.

 

Freedom of Information requests were submitted to 120 universities across the UK for the research, with 110 providing responses.

 

The anonymised analysis that follows shows 20% of respondents do not currently provide any internal anti-money laundering training for staff, and 24% of respondents do not provide any guidance to their students on the risks posed to them by financial and organised crime.

 

Although 17 universities noted they stopped accepting cash payments during or after 2019/2020, the results show 22 institutions continue to accept cash for tuition fees and accommodation.

 

Three institutions each accepted more than £1m in cash payments in 2019/20 with the total amount of cash payments across 39 universities adding up to £12m in the same year.

 

The findings also reveal most universities do not submit suspicious activity reports (SARs) to the authorities. Current guidelines require organisations and individuals to do so when they suspect criminal activity and to ensure they are not liable for wrongdoing.

 

Money laundering is the process from which the proceeds of organised crime enter the banking system to appear legitimate, funding a “champagne lifestyle” for criminals. Although it is difficult to quantify the scale of the problem, academics estimate it could amount to between £44bn and £111bn annually in the UK alone.

 

Lead author Professor Nicholas Ryder, based at Cardiff University’s School of Law and Politics, said: “Organised criminal gangs are increasingly using higher education institutions and students as a means to launder money. But the response to the issue from the sector up to now has been poorly understood. Our findings demonstrate that many universities are failing to establish robust preventative measures, putting staff and students at risk of being targeted.

 

Most universities have ceased the acceptance of cash payments, but we found a significant number are still willing to do so. What’s even more concerning is that some organisations do not impose any limit on the amount paid in cash. Most higher education institutions are also seemingly failing to recognise the value of financial intelligence created by suspicious activity reports, as well as the related defence they provide to employees.

 

Current legislation needs to be tightened. While universities are not explicitly included within the regulations, the disparity of its application across the sector will continue, leaving universities, their employees, and their students at high risk of money laundering and criminal liability.”

 

Dr Samantha Bourton, Senior Lecturer in Law at UWE said: “Our research has identified reports of universities accepting suspicious payments from convicted criminals and corrupt Politically Exposed Persons. Further, several reported cases have illustrated how students allow their bank accounts to be misused by organised criminals, with detrimental consequences to their wellbeing and future career prospects.

 

Despite these risks, our research revealed that there is significant disparity among higher education institutions regarding the implementation of established anti-money laundering measures. To address this issue, our paper recommends that universities are explicitly included within the scope of anti-money laundering regulations.”